网络著作权侵害责任限制法（；缩写：）是美国联邦法律，旨在为（包括互联网服务供应商在内）和其他互联网中介结构创建一个有条件的“安全港条款”，通过屏蔽它们的直接盗版行为（它们制作未经授权的副本）来保护它们免受他人侵权行为所的潜在。《网络著作权侵害责任限制法》作为《数字千年版权法》的一部分被通过，因而有时被称为“安全港條款（避风港规则/）”或“DMCA512限责条款（）”，因为该法案为《美国法典》增加了第512节。通过要求互联网中介机构遵守某些规则来豁免它们的侵权责任，《网络著作权侵害责任限制法》试图平衡版权所有者与数字用户之间的竞争利益。
相关案例
- [https://www.eff.org/cases/diehl-v-crook 迪尔诉克鲁克案]
- 索尼美国公司诉环球城市影业公司案
- [https://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/907_FSupp_1361.htm 宗教技术中心诉网通在线通讯服务公司案]
*
*
*
*
参考资料
參見
*安全港条款：
**安全港原則
**網絡著作權侵害責任限制法
外部链接
- [https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/512 《网络著作权侵害责任限制法》（美国法典第17章512节）全文]
- [https://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf 《数字千年版权法》摘要] 在美国版权局网站
一般
- , Text of OCILLA
*[http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf U.S. Copyright Office Summary of the DMCA]
*[http://www.chillingeffects.org/dmca512/faq.cgi Chilling Effect's FAQs] , about DMCA Safe Harbor Provisions
*[http://www.copyright.gov/onlinesp/list/a_agents.html U.S. Copyright Office List] , of Designated Agents for Infringement Notification
使用OCILLA
*[http://www.gimmelaw.com/the-digital-millennium-copyright-act-dmca-the-law-and-how-to-use-it DMCA Guide] , with sample copyright infringement notices and counter-notices
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20090321044254/http://www.web-hosting-newsletter.com/2008/06/23/lunar-legal-digital-millennium-copyright-act/ Using DMCA to Protect Your Content], Lunar Legal (June 2008)
*[http://www.marketingdock.com/copyrights/dealing-with-copyright-infringement.php How to File a DMCA Copyright Infringement Notice] , Marketingdock.com
- [https://web.archive.org/web/20101004194736/http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/IntellectualProperty/dmcaisp.htm Responding to Notices of Alleged Infringement], University of Texas
判例法
[https://www.eff.org/cases/diehl-v-crook Diehl v. Crook*] , Electronic Frontier Foundation's successful 2006 suit against an illegal takedown notice
[https://web.archive.org/web/20080919165747/http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/US/464/464.US.417.81-1687.html Sony Corp. of Am. v. Universal City Studios Inc.*], 464 U.S. 417 (1984).
[https://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/907_FSupp_1361.htm Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Netcom On-Line Commc'n Servs., Inc.*] , 907 F. Supp. 1361 (N.D. Cal. 1995).
[https://web.archive.org/web/20081015192741/http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/373/373.F3d.544.03-1911.html Costar Group, Inc. v. Loopnet, Inc.*], 373 F.3d 544 (4th Cir. 2004).
[https://www.eff.org/files/filenode/OPG_v_Diebold/OPG%20v.%20Diebold%20ruling.pdf Online Policy Group et al. v. Diebold, Inc.*] , 337 F.Supp.2d 1195 (N.D. Cal. 2004).
[https://web.archive.org/web/20080409010037/http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/239/239.F3d.1004.00-16403.00-16401.html A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.*], 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001).
- [http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2007/05/30/0457143.pdf Perfect 10, Inc. v. CCBill, LLC] , 488 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2007).
评论 (0)